Documentation score and implementation score should not be the same
A single compliance percentage hides the difference between written process and working control evidence.

One score hides too much
A control can look complete on paper and still fail in practice. The reverse also happens: a team may have a working technical safeguard with weak written ownership.
For compliance operators, these are different problems. Documentation gaps need policy work. Implementation gaps need engineering, operations, or process change.
What each score means
Documentation score should measure whether the team has clear, dated, reviewable written evidence. Implementation score should measure whether the control appears to operate in the system, workflow, or evidence trail.
Documentation evidence: policies, procedures, registers, meeting records, approval notes
Implementation evidence: configuration, scan signals, access settings, tests, logs, workflow activity
Evidence confidence: source quality, age, linkage, and traceability
How this changes remediation
When the scores are split, remediation can become specific. The system can say whether to update a document, connect a source, run a test, or assign an owner.
Build the evidence trail
Kodex Compliance helps teams turn questionnaires, documents, implementation proof, and reviewer decisions into a clear compliance record.
Request demo